forbes.com
“Smart
city” is a term we are going to be hearing a lot more of in the coming years.
It’s thought that by 2020 we will be spending $400 billion a year building them
– but what are they?
The idea is
to embed the advances in technology and data collection which are making the
Internet of Things a reality into the infrastructures of the environments where
we live. Already, large companies such as Cisco and IBM IBM +0.24% are working
with universities and civic planning authorities to develop data-driven systems
for transport, waste management, law enforcement, and energy use to make them
more efficient and improve the lives of citizens.
We will
interact and get information from these smart systems using our smart phones,
watches and other wearables, and crucially, the machines will also speak to
each other. Garbage trucks will be alerted to the location of refuse that needs
collecting, and sensors in our cars will direct us towards available parking
spaces.
The model
most commonly adopted so far is to attract businesses which develop software
and hardware applications for the Internet of Things, and encourage them to put
their ingenuity to use to smarten the surrounding areas. Public money is often
put up as an incentive to do so – an example is Glasgow, Scotland, the
government has offered £24 million ($37 million) for technology which will make
the city “smarter, safer and more sustainable”.
Applications
developed or planned for the program include intelligent street lighting which
will switch itself off to conserve energy when there’s no one around, mapping
energy use around the city to better understand demand, and mapping how people
get around to maximize the use of bicycle and foot paths.
A smart city showcase in China in May. (Photo credit: STR/AFP/Getty Images)
Sensors
attached to street lights and other outside urban furniture will measure
footfall, noise levels and air pollution and this data will be used to
prioritize delivery of other services. The government’s Technology Strategy
Board, which is coordinating the project, says that more than 200 potential
streams of data have been identified and although many of them are already
enabled to collect data, the information is often held in isolation. That’s
about to change. The extensive CCTV network in Glasgow will, for example, begin
monitoring traffic and street lighting as well as crime and disorder. Data from
multiple sources analyzed together is almost always more valuable than sources
held in isolation.
Down in
England (Bristol to be precise) another program involves the development of a
wireless network specifically dedicated to Internet of Things and Smart City
communications between devices. These transmissions will use less power than
existing wi-fi and mobile networks, making them more environmentally friendly –
ideal for devices which need to be kept running 24/7.
Songdo, in
South Korea, is an example of a city built from scratch with smart technology
integrated from the ground up. Based on land reclaimed from the sea, 40% of the
city is designated as open green areas, still leaving room for 80,000
apartments and 500 million square feet of office space. Every home and office
will have a built-in terminal connecting it to the systems monitoring the
public infrastructure, and a smart energy grid will monitor and regulate supply
and demand. One thing the city will not have will be garbage trucks. Refuse is
“sucked” from household disposal units directly to sewage treatment centres,
where it is disposed of in an environmentally friendly way. There are plans to
eventually use it to generate power for the city.
Of course,
there are plenty of people voicing the need for caution over this wave of new
technology. The systems are designed to collect and interact with intimate
details of our personal lives such as where we travel, who we associate with,
and even how we dispose of the waste materials we generate. There is a danger
that in the rush to be the first to develop and market solutions aimed at
improving citizens’ everyday lives, some aspects of privacy or information
security could be overlooked.
On top of
that, others have voiced concerns that, particularly in the developing world,
living in Smart Cities could be prohibitively expensive for much of the
population, leading to them becoming enclaves of the elite, with local governance
enforcing social apartheid by keeping out the poor.
These are
challenges which will have to be overcome by the architects behind the new
systems, as well as legislators and civic authorities. With smart phones and
mobile technology increasingly becoming available to a larger number of people,
it should be possible to create inclusive systems which are available to all.
Others have
said that Smart City is just another buzzword – like Internet of Things itself,
or even Big Data. And they are probably right. The language might change – we
will probably eventually just take the technology for granted and there will be
no need for a special term to differentiate “smart” cities from standard ones.
But the
advances in convenience and quality of life that they enable are likely to
endure, so it’s a safe bet that the amalgamation of IoT technology and civic
infrastructure will continue, and become increasingly prevalent as time goes
on.
No comments:
Post a Comment